TI.
Book a demonstration

Tender analysis for construction commercial teams

The whole tender, read.
Every finding, evidenced.

TI analyses the full tender pack - conditions of contract, scope, submission requirements and key dates - and turns it into a commercial review that quantity surveyors, commercial managers and bid teams can act on. Every finding links back to the clause and page it came from, so the decision to pursue, review or decline rests on evidence you can check.

Book a demonstrationSee how TI works

A tender under review in TI: the project, its most serious commercial risk, a submission requirement - and the citations that lead back to the source documents.

CHE-2026-ME-001 · City Hall Extension - M&E ServicesDemonstration data
Form of contract
JCT Design & Build 2016, amended
Estimated value
£4.2m estimated
Submission
24 Jul 2026, 12:00
Clarifications close
15 Jul 2026
High
Cap on liquidated damages removed by amendment
Sch. of Amendments · Cl 2.32 · p 12
Requirement
Collateral warranties executed as deeds, including M&E subcontractor warranties
ITT Vol 1 · §9.2 · p 27
842 pages read14 risks23 submission requirements5 key dates2 missing documentsevery finding traceable to source

How TI works

From a folder of documents to a decision you can defend.

Six stages, one workspace, the same tender from receipt to recommendation. The demonstration tender below runs through all of them.

01

Bring the tender together

Upload the pack as it arrived - invitation, conditions of contract, amendments, specifications, schedules. TI classifies each document and reads them together, so nothing is reviewed in isolation.

The complete tender in one workspace.

CHE-2026-ME-001 · DocumentsDemonstration data
  • ITT Volume 1 - Instructions to TenderersInvitationRead
  • ITT Volume 2 - Conditions of ContractContractRead
  • Schedule of AmendmentsContractRead
  • Employer's RequirementsSpecificationRead
  • Pricing DocumentCommercialRead
  • Pre-Construction InformationH&SRead
02

Understand the project

TI sets out what the job actually is: the works, the parties, the form of contract, the programme and the commercial arrangements - before anyone opens a PDF.

A project summary you can brief the team from.

CHE-2026-ME-001 · Project summaryDemonstration data
Client
Northmoor City Council
Works
Mechanical & electrical services for a three-storey extension to the existing city hall
Form of contract
JCT Design & Build 2016, amended
Estimated value
£4.2m estimated
Submission
24 Jul 2026, 12:00
Clarifications close
15 Jul 2026
03

Identify what needs attention

Commercial risks, onerous and amended clauses, submission requirements, deadlines and gaps in the information - surfaced and ranked, so review time goes where it matters.

A prioritised register of findings, not a pile of notes.

CHE-2026-ME-001 · FindingsDemonstration data
  • HighCap on liquidated damages removed by amendmentSch. of Amendments · Cl 2.32 · p 12
  • HighFitness-for-purpose obligation introduced for M&E designEmployer's Reqs · §3.1.4 · p 41
  • HighEmployer may omit works and engage others without compensationSch. of Amendments · Cl 3.11 · p 17
  • MissingGround investigation report is referenced but not issued with the pack
04

Review the evidence

Every finding carries its source: the document, the clause, the page. Open the passage alongside the finding, read it in context, and confirm or dismiss it - that judgement stays on the record.

Findings you can verify before you rely on them.

Finding · EvidenceDemonstration data
HighCap on liquidated damages removed by amendment
“Clause 2.32 is amended by the deletion of the words ‘up to the aggregate cap stated in the Contract Particulars’.”
Sch. of Amendments · Cl 2.32 · p 12contradictsITT Vol 1 · §6.4 · p 18
Reviewer decisionConfirmedRaise clarification
05

Assess against risk appetite

Your organisation's commercial position - on liability caps, damages, payment terms, warranties - is applied to what TI found. The same clause reads differently at £4m than at £40m; appetite makes that explicit.

Findings weighed against your position, not generic commentary.

Appetite assessmentDemonstration data
  • Uncapped liquidated damagesOutside
  • Fitness-for-purpose design obligationOutside
  • 60-day payment termsTolerated
  • Collateral warranties as deedsWithin
06

Make the tender decision

The TI Memo brings it together: the project, the material risks, the requirements, the appetite assessment and the open questions - every line still linked to source. Pursue, review further, or decline, on the record.

A recommendation the board can interrogate.

CHE-2026-ME-001 · TI MemoDemonstration data
Recommendation
Pursuesubject to clarification of Cl 2.32 and §3.1.4

The project suits the business: right sector, right scale, framework client. Two amended terms sit outside stated appetite - the removed LD cap and the fitness-for-purpose obligation - and both are clarifiable before the 15 July cut-off. The ground investigation report is outstanding and should be requested now.

The walkthrough

Follow one tender through TI.

The same demonstration tender runs through this whole page: an M&E services package for a city hall extension, £4.2m estimated, let under an amended JCT Design & Build contract. Step through the moments that matter.

CHE-2026-ME-001 · Project summaryDemonstration data
Risks identified
14
3 high · 6 medium · 5 low
Submission requirements
23
3 due at tender stage
Key dates
5
clarifications close 15 Jul 2026
Missing documents
2
requested from client
Mechanical & electrical services for a three-storey extension to the existing city hall. JCT Design & Build 2016, amended. Client: Northmoor City Council.

First open: the shape of the job and the state of the review, before any documents are opened.

Capabilities

What TI covers.

The walkthrough shows the shape of the work. This is the breadth behind it.

Commercial risk identification
Onerous terms, unusual allocations and commercial exposure, ranked by severity.
Contract and clause review
Amendments tracked against the standard form, clause by clause.
Submission requirement extraction
Everything the tender asks you to return, as a working checklist.
Deadline and key-date identification
Submission, clarification cut-offs, site visits and validity periods.
Project and tender summaries
The job, the parties and the terms, in brief.
TI Memo
The review condensed for the people who make the decision.
Risk-appetite assessment
Findings weighed against your organisation's stated tolerances.
Evidence-linked findings
Each finding cites its document, clause and page.
Document traceability
Which document, which version, which passage - throughout the review.
Controlled re-analysis
When addenda land, TI re-reads what changed and shows what moved.

Trust & evidence

Built to support judgement, not replace it.

TI does the reading. The review stays yours. The system is designed so a professional can check its work - quickly.

Findings are reviewed, not accepted
Every finding waits for a professional to confirm, dismiss or query it. That judgement - and who made it - stays on the record.
Everything traces to source
A finding without a citation is a claim. In TI, each one carries its document, clause and page, one step from the passage itself.
Uncertainty is visible
Missing documents, unissued reports and low-confidence extractions are flagged as gaps - not smoothed over.
Three kinds of statement, kept distinct
What the documents say, what TI's analysis suggests, and how your organisation assesses it are labelled differently everywhere they appear.
No guarantees where none exist
TI supports professional review. It does not replace commercial or legal advice, and it does not pretend to.

How statements are labelled

  • Sch. of Amendments · Cl 2.32 · p 12

    Extracted fact. Quoted from the documents, with its citation.

  • TI analysis

    Generated analysis. TI's reading of what the passage means commercially.

  • Outside appetite

    Your assessment. The finding measured against your organisation's position.

From finding to source

FindingClause & pageThe passage itself, in context

Who it's for

The people who carry the tender.

Quantity surveyors
Contract review that starts from a marked-up register with citations - not a blank margin and 842 pages.
Commercial managers
The exposure on every live bid, visible before it is priced in - or missed.
Estimators
Scope, pricing documents and information gaps identified before the take-off starts.
Bid managers
Submission requirements and deadlines as one checklist the whole team works from.
Pre-construction teams
A single record of what the tender says that holds as addenda and revisions land.
Directors
A pursue, review or decline recommendation you can interrogate line by line.

See it on your own work

Bring a tender.

The quickest way to judge TI is on a pack you know. Book a working session: we run a recent tender through TI while you watch - you see the risks and requirements it finds, follow the evidence, and assess whether the opportunity would have fitted your appetite.

Book a demonstrationOr read a tender teardown

Your documents stay in a private tenant, under NDA if you prefer, and are deleted on request.